1) Background
Previous SG (steam generator) safety valves experienced several design shortcomings:
Search
18 results recovered
Contract information field: Programme
Contract information field: Country
Contract information field: Budget year
Contract information field: Status
Contract information field: Contractor
- IBL (2) Apply IBL filter
- Lisega (2) Apply Lisega filter
- SEMPELL AG (2) Apply SEMPELL AG filter
- Bopp & Reuther (1) Apply Bopp & Reuther filter
- Brühl&Kjaer (1) Apply Brühl&Kjaer filter
- EFCO (1) Apply EFCO filter
- HK (Hahn & Kolb) (1) Apply HK (Hahn & Kolb) filter
- Huntsman (1) Apply Huntsman filter
- KSC Anlagenbau (Kraftswerk - Service Cottbus) (1) Apply KSC Anlagenbau (Kraftswerk - Service Cottbus) filter
- Rados (1) Apply Rados filter
- Rohm & Haas (1) Apply Rohm & Haas filter
- SEBIM (1) Apply SEBIM filter
- svt Brandschutz (1) Apply svt Brandschutz filter
- VHB Germany (1) Apply VHB Germany filter
- Werner Riester (1) Apply Werner Riester filter
Contract information field: Types of activities
Contract information field: Partner (Beneficiary)
- (-) Remove EnergoAtom filter EnergoAtom (18)
- (-) Remove Chernobyl NPP filter Chernobyl NPP (0)
- (-) Remove State Scientific Center of Russian Federation "Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics" filter State Scientific Center of Russian Federation "Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics" (0)
- Rosenergoatom (16) Apply Rosenergoatom filter
- Armenian Nuclear Power Plant (9) Apply Armenian Nuclear Power Plant filter
- MINATOM RF, later ROSATOM (since 12/2007) (9) Apply MINATOM RF, later ROSATOM (since 12/2007) filter
- NNEGC Energoatom (1) Apply NNEGC Energoatom filter
Contract information field: Installation Types
Contract information field: Nuclear Power Plant
Contract information field: Nature
Contract information field: Method of procurement
Countries:
Ukraine
Programme:
TACIS
Budget year:
1996
Amount:
€ 811.837,00
Countries:
Ukraine
Programme:
TACIS
Budget year:
1996
Amount:
€ 878.604,00
Beneficiary Organisation: Energoatom - NAEK (beneficiary) and Rovno NPP (end user)
1) Background
Countries:
Ukraine
Programme:
TACIS
Budget year:
1996
Amount:
€ 52.468,30
Beneficiary organisation: Energoatom, Ukraine
1) Background
Rovno NPP unit 3 is equipped with some foreign made piston shock absorbers. Due to difficult economic conditions, it was difficult to Rovno NPP to procure relevant spare parts and to implement adequate maintenance.
Countries:
Ukraine
Programme:
TACIS
Budget year:
1996
Amount:
€ 41.456,10
Beneficiary Organisation: Energoatom
1) Background
Countries:
Ukraine
Programme:
TACIS
Budget year:
1996
Amount:
€ 40.300,00
Beneficiary Organisation: Energoatom
1) Background
Countries:
Ukraine
Programme:
TACIS
Budget year:
1996
Amount:
€ 6.047,00
Objectives
Countries:
Ukraine
Programme:
TACIS
Budget year:
1996
Amount:
€ 172.555,00
Objectives
Countries:
Ukraine
Programme:
TACIS
Budget year:
1996
Amount:
€ 49.420,00
Objectives
Countries:
Ukraine
Programme:
TACIS
Budget year:
1996
Amount:
€ 502.171,00
Objectives
Countries:
Ukraine
Programme:
TACIS
Budget year:
1996
Amount:
€ 348.843,00
1) Background
Countries:
Ukraine
Programme:
TACIS
Budget year:
1996
Amount:
€ 8.546,00
1) Background
Countries:
Ukraine
Programme:
TACIS
Budget year:
1996
Amount:
€ 17.921,54
1) Background
Countries:
Ukraine
Programme:
TACIS
Budget year:
1996
Amount:
€ 644.144,00
1) Background
Countries:
Ukraine
Programme:
TACIS
Budget year:
1996
Amount:
€ 18.832,99
1) Background
Countries:
Ukraine
Programme:
TACIS
Budget year:
1996
Amount:
€ 166.171,00
Background
Countries:
Ukraine
Programme:
TACIS
Budget year:
1996
Amount:
€ 768.146,00
1) Background
Countries:
Ukraine
Programme:
TACIS
Budget year:
1996
Amount:
€ 476.505,13
1) Background
The issue of the integrity of the cable penetrations in relation to fire was identified by the IAEA and ranked level 3. Moreover, the ZNPP received in 1995 a licence conditions for operation from SNRC.
Countries:
Ukraine
Programme:
TACIS
Budget year:
1996
Amount:
€ 1.499.203,00
Objectives
In the framework of the Tacis Nuclear Safety Programme, it was decided to increase the nuclear safety of the units 1 through 6 at the Zaporozhye NPP by improving the protection of the primary circuit from overpressure under normal and emergency modes.