Objective
Search
Contract information field: Programme
Contract information field: Country
Contract information field: Budget year
- 2013 (1) Apply 2013 filter
- 2012 (3) Apply 2012 filter
- 2011 (4) Apply 2011 filter
- 2010 (2) Apply 2010 filter
- 2009 (4) Apply 2009 filter
- 2008 (6) Apply 2008 filter
- 2007 (6) Apply 2007 filter
- 2006 (6) Apply 2006 filter
- 2005 (5) Apply 2005 filter
- 2004 (1) Apply 2004 filter
- 2003 (3) Apply 2003 filter
- 2002 (3) Apply 2002 filter
- 2001 (5) Apply 2001 filter
- 2000 (1) Apply 2000 filter
- 1999 (4) Apply 1999 filter
- 1998 (4) Apply 1998 filter
- 1997 (13) Apply 1997 filter
- 1996 (14) Apply 1996 filter
- 1995 (21) Apply 1995 filter
- (-) Remove 1994 filter 1994 (17)
- 1993 (10) Apply 1993 filter
- 1992 (19) Apply 1992 filter
- 1991 (8) Apply 1991 filter
Contract information field: Status
Contract information field: Contractor
- Datost (2) Apply Datost filter
- INKLA (2) Apply INKLA filter
- Trischler und Partner (2) Apply Trischler und Partner filter
- Bopp & Reuther (1) Apply Bopp & Reuther filter
- DataLoop (1) Apply DataLoop filter
- EFCO (1) Apply EFCO filter
- Enprima Engineering Oy (1) Apply Enprima Engineering Oy filter
- GEMCO (1) Apply GEMCO filter
- IBL (1) Apply IBL filter
- ISMES (1) Apply ISMES filter
- KSC Anlagenbau (Kraftswerk - Service Cottbus) (1) Apply KSC Anlagenbau (Kraftswerk - Service Cottbus) filter
- NERSA (Centrale Nucleaire Europeenne a Neutrons Rapides) (1) Apply NERSA (Centrale Nucleaire Europeenne a Neutrons Rapides) filter
- NIKIMT (Institute of Assembly Technology) (1) Apply NIKIMT (Institute of Assembly Technology) filter
- SEMPELL AG (1) Apply SEMPELL AG filter
Contract information field: Sector
- DS - Design safety (incl. Off-Site Emergency Preparedness) (1) Apply DS - Design safety (incl. Off-Site Emergency Preparedness) filter
- HI - Horizontal Issues (1) Apply HI - Horizontal Issues filter
- WDS - Waste, Decommissioning and Safeguards (1) Apply WDS - Waste, Decommissioning and Safeguards filter
Contract information field: Types of activities
Contract information field: Partner (Beneficiary)
Contract information field: Meta geographical zone
Contract information field: Installation Types
Contract information field: Nuclear Power Plant
- (-) Remove South Ukraine filter South Ukraine (11)
- (-) Remove Beloyarsk filter Beloyarsk (3)
- (-) Remove Chernobyl filter Chernobyl (3)
- Kalinin (15) Apply Kalinin filter
- Novovoronezh (11) Apply Novovoronezh filter
- Zaporozhye (11) Apply Zaporozhye filter
- Balakovo (10) Apply Balakovo filter
- Kola (8) Apply Kola filter
- Paks (6) Apply Paks filter
- Smolensk (6) Apply Smolensk filter
- Aktau (5) Apply Aktau filter
- Dukovany (5) Apply Dukovany filter
- Bohunice (4) Apply Bohunice filter
- Rovno (4) Apply Rovno filter
- Leningrad (Sosnovy Bor) (3) Apply Leningrad (Sosnovy Bor) filter
- Medzamor (2) Apply Medzamor filter
- Temelin (2) Apply Temelin filter
- Ignalina (1) Apply Ignalina filter
- Kozloduy (1) Apply Kozloduy filter
- Mochovce (1) Apply Mochovce filter
Contract information field: Nature
Contract information field: Method of procurement
Objectives
Beneficiary organisation: Energoatom, Ukraine
1) Background
South Ukraine NPP needed support for improvement of its maintenance system: maintenance management was not performed according to modern practice.
2) Objectives
1) Background
Background
Background
This project is part of the Reactor Pressure Vessel In-Service Inspection Project U1.02/92A.
Beneficiary organisation: Energoatom, Ukraine
1) Background
South Ukraine NPP needed support for improvement of its maintenance system: maintenance management was not performed according to modern practice.
2) Objectives
Beneficiary organisation: Energoatom, Ukraine
1) Background
South Ukraine NPP needed support for improvement of its maintenance system: maintenance management was not performed according to modern practice.
2) Objectives
Beneficiary organisation: Energoatom, Ukraine
1) Background
South Ukraine NPP needed support for improvement of its maintenance system: maintenance management was not performed according to modern practice.
2) Objectives
Beneficiary organisation: Energoatom, Ukraine
1) Background
South Ukraine NPP needed support for improvement of its maintenance system: maintenance management was not performed according to modern practice.
2) Objectives
Beneficiary organisation: Energoatom, Ukraine
1) Background
South Ukraine NPP needed support for improvement of its maintenance system: maintenance management was not performed according to modern practice.
2) Objectives
Objective
According to the intention of the European Union and the Russian Ministry of Atomic Power the operational safety assistance, which started with TACIS 92, continued with TACIS 94 with the same Western and Eastern Utility and NPPs.
Background
Background
1) Background
1) Background
1) Background