Objective
According to the intention of the European Union and the Russian Ministry of Atomic Power the operational safety assistance, which started with TACIS 92, continued with TACIS 94 with the same Western and Eastern Utility and NPPs.
Search
13 results recovered
Contract information field: Programme
Contract information field: Country
Contract information field: Budget year
Contract information field: Status
Contract information field: Contractor
- EDF (Electricite de France) (6) Apply EDF (Electricite de France) filter
- NERSA (Centrale Nucleaire Europeenne a Neutrons Rapides) (3) Apply NERSA (Centrale Nucleaire Europeenne a Neutrons Rapides) filter
- Riskaudit (1) Apply Riskaudit filter
- SEMPELL AG (1) Apply SEMPELL AG filter
- SOGIN (Societa Gestione Impianti Nucleari) (1) Apply SOGIN (Societa Gestione Impianti Nucleari) filter
- Technoserv (1) Apply Technoserv filter
Contract information field: Sector
Contract information field: Types of activities
Contract information field: Partner (Beneficiary)
Contract information field: Installation Types
Contract information field: Nuclear Power Plant
- (-) Remove Beloyarsk filter Beloyarsk (11)
- (-) Remove Bilibino filter Bilibino (2)
- Chernobyl (30) Apply Chernobyl filter
- Novovoronezh (19) Apply Novovoronezh filter
- Rovno (18) Apply Rovno filter
- Kola (17) Apply Kola filter
- Smolensk (17) Apply Smolensk filter
- Zaporozhye (17) Apply Zaporozhye filter
- Kalinin (16) Apply Kalinin filter
- Medzamor (15) Apply Medzamor filter
- South Ukraine (15) Apply South Ukraine filter
- Balakovo (13) Apply Balakovo filter
- Leningrad (Sosnovy Bor) (11) Apply Leningrad (Sosnovy Bor) filter
- Khmelnitsky (9) Apply Khmelnitsky filter
- Aktau (6) Apply Aktau filter
Contract information field: Nature
Contract information field: Method of procurement
- (-) Remove Direct Agreement filter Direct Agreement (11)
- (-) Remove Open Call for Tender filter Open Call for Tender (2)
- Special Fund (Procurement Agent) (15) Apply Special Fund (Procurement Agent) filter
- Negotiated Procedure (2) Apply Negotiated Procedure filter
- Competitive Dialogue (1) Apply Competitive Dialogue filter
Countries:
Russia
Programme:
TACIS
Budget year:
1994
Amount:
€ 673.652,51
Countries:
Russia
Programme:
TACIS
Budget year:
2005
Amount:
€ 9.318.912,00
Background
Countries:
Russia
Programme:
TACIS
Budget year:
2003
Amount:
€ 1.045.000,00
Bilibino NPP
Bilibino nuclear power and district heating plant (NPDHP) was the first nuclear power station built beyond the Polar Circle in the central part of the Chukotka peninsula, and it provides electricity for the regional mining and gold mining industries.
Countries:
Russia
Programme:
TACIS
Budget year:
2000
Amount:
€ 114.416,06
Bilibino NPP
Bilibino nuclear power and district heating plant (NPDHP) was the first nuclear power station built beyond the Polar Circle in the central part of the Chukotka peninsula, and it provides electricity for the regional mining and gold mining industries.
Countries:
Russia
Programme:
TACIS
Budget year:
1997
Amount:
€ 595.491,42
Objective
Countries:
Russia
Programme:
TACIS
Budget year:
1998
Amount:
€ 700.000,00
Objective
Countries:
Russia
Programme:
TACIS
Budget year:
1996
Amount:
€ 1.175.443,18
Objectives
Countries:
Russia
Programme:
TACIS
Budget year:
2002
Amount:
€ 1.632.650,61
Project Description
Countries:
Russia
Programme:
TACIS
Budget year:
2002
Amount:
€ 550.194,65
Background
Countries:
Russia
Programme:
TACIS
Budget year:
1993
Amount:
€ 148.651,84
Objective
On request of the Beneficiary a simulator (see Project R1.06/93) was provided for instruction and proficiency training of operator teams to improve their skills and knowledge to operate the BN 600 NPP at Beloyarsk.
Countries:
Russia
Programme:
TACIS
Budget year:
1992
Amount:
€ 167.577,77
Objective
Countries:
Russia
Programme:
TACIS
Budget year:
1993
Amount:
€ 487.664,87
Objective
The project’s objective covered research, design, supply and commissioning of:
Countries:
Russia
Programme:
TACIS
Budget year:
1992
Amount:
€ 570.143,59
Objective (phase 2)
The objective of this project was to continue the work started in a first phase under the same project number. This project is to be seen as a contractual extension of the previous one with the same number R1.06/7/92.
Result